Skip to main content

Marketing to Children



 Marketing to children is the act of preparing and displaying adverts that directly target children. These adverts aim to increase children's demand for the advertised goods and services. Recently, business organizations have increased their expenditure on the advertisement to children. Businesses are now estimated to spend about $17 billion on marketing to children (Marketing to Children Overview, n.d.). This trend has become so worrying that many people have begun to question this practice by businesses (Clay, 2000). It is unethical for businesses to target children when advertising their products. This practice should stop. 


 Unnecessary Pressure on Parents


Advertising to children puts unnecessary pressure on parents (Clay, 2000). When adverts that target children reach the children, children usually demand the advertised good or service from the parent. They will keep nagging the parents for the advertised good or service. The innocent nature of children makes them unable to consider their parents' financial circumstances. This situation becomes stressful for parents, especially those who are struggling financially at the moment. Parents usually end up in a dilemma. They are torn between looking good and capable in their children's eyes and meeting the necessary bills. Stressed and depressed parents are usually vulnerable to assaulting their nagging children. 


 Increased Materialistic Tendencies

Additionally, marketing to children is responsible for the increased materialistic tendencies evident in children today (Clay, 2000). Advertisements that target children have created a mentality in children that "having is everything" and "not having is nothing." Today's children do not believe that it is okay not to have certain things in life. It is why the less fortunate children, whose parents cannot buy them certain advertised products, experience bullying in schools. Moreover, today, most children's dreams have shifted to simply having much money when they grow up. These dreams differ from those of children of the earlier generations, who dreamed of getting involved in careers such as medicine, teaching, astronomy, engineering, and much more. This focus on money, which is very dangerous, can be blamed on adverts that show that it is only okay to have. 


 One realizes that the act of marketing to children is very irresponsible. It is unfair to place unnecessary pressure on parents and unethical to destroy the moral values that children need to have. These two and many more reasons suggest why everyone should come together and oppose marketing to children.


 References

Clay, R. A. (2000, September). Advertising to children: Is it ethical? Monitor on Psychology, p. 52.

Marketing to Children Overview. (n.d.). Retrieved from Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood: http://www.commercialfreechildhood.org/resource/marketing-children-overview

  


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is There Hope for Kenya? A Bleak Outlook on Tribalism and Failed Leadership

 Kenya, a nation endowed with immense potential, continues to struggle under the weight of tribalism, corruption, and failed leadership. The hope for a better future dims with each passing administration, as those entrusted with power prioritize self-enrichment over national progress. To understand why Kenya’s situation appears hopeless, we must revisit the mistakes of the past—beginning with the election of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto in 2013. A Nation That Rewards Impunity In 2013, Kenyans made a grave mistake: electing two individuals facing charges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for their alleged roles in the 2007-2008 post-election violence, which claimed over 1,000 lives. Despite Kenyan law barring individuals with criminal charges from vying for office, Uhuru and Ruto were allowed to run—a clear disregard for the rule of law. Worse, they won, signaling that a majority of Kenyans were willing to overlook serious allegations if it meant their "tribal champions...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Long Shadow of Colonial Violence: Police Brutality in Kenya from Harry Thuku to Albert Ojwang'

The baton strikes cracking protestors' skulls in Nairobi's streets today carry echoes from a darker past—the rhythmic thuds of colonial askaris beating African laborers in 1920s Thika, the gunfire that cut down Mau Mau fighters in Aberdare forests, the sickening crunch of steel against bone when a police Land Rover crushed George Morara's car in 1969. Kenya's police brutality is not an aberration but a tradition, meticulously preserved across generations of political change. What began as a colonial instrument of subjugation has evolved into the ruling elite's most reliable weapon for subjugation, its violence never dissipating.   The origins of this systemic brutality trace back to the very formation of the colonial police force—an institution designed not to serve but to dominate. Before European occupation, African communities maintained order through social systems of elders' councils, age-set accountability, and communal justice. The British replaced these ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Flawed Logic of China Fearmongering: A Rebuttal to Phillip Inman

 Phillip Inman's recent article, "World must be more wary than ever of China’s growing economic power,"  recycles tired Western anxieties about China's rise while ignoring the hypocrisy and self-interest driving these concerns. His arguments—framed as warnings—reveal not China's threats, but the West's inability to compete fairly in a changing global order.   Inman begins by praising Donald Trump's economic blockade against China, framing tariffs as legitimate tools of economic policy. This stance is baffling for anyone who believes in free markets. Tariffs artificially inflate prices, denying consumers access to the best goods at competitive rates. When governments impose such barriers, they don't protect their citizens—they impoverish them. The real victims are ordinary people forced to pay more for products that could have been affordable. Yet Inman celebrates these measures as if economic warfare benefits anyone but protectionist politicians.   His...
Post a Comment
Read more