Skip to main content

Marketing to Children



 Marketing to children is the act of preparing and displaying adverts that directly target children. These adverts aim to increase children's demand for the advertised goods and services. Recently, business organizations have increased their expenditure on the advertisement to children. Businesses are now estimated to spend about $17 billion on marketing to children (Marketing to Children Overview, n.d.). This trend has become so worrying that many people have begun to question this practice by businesses (Clay, 2000). It is unethical for businesses to target children when advertising their products. This practice should stop. 


 Unnecessary Pressure on Parents


Advertising to children puts unnecessary pressure on parents (Clay, 2000). When adverts that target children reach the children, children usually demand the advertised good or service from the parent. They will keep nagging the parents for the advertised good or service. The innocent nature of children makes them unable to consider their parents' financial circumstances. This situation becomes stressful for parents, especially those who are struggling financially at the moment. Parents usually end up in a dilemma. They are torn between looking good and capable in their children's eyes and meeting the necessary bills. Stressed and depressed parents are usually vulnerable to assaulting their nagging children. 


 Increased Materialistic Tendencies

Additionally, marketing to children is responsible for the increased materialistic tendencies evident in children today (Clay, 2000). Advertisements that target children have created a mentality in children that "having is everything" and "not having is nothing." Today's children do not believe that it is okay not to have certain things in life. It is why the less fortunate children, whose parents cannot buy them certain advertised products, experience bullying in schools. Moreover, today, most children's dreams have shifted to simply having much money when they grow up. These dreams differ from those of children of the earlier generations, who dreamed of getting involved in careers such as medicine, teaching, astronomy, engineering, and much more. This focus on money, which is very dangerous, can be blamed on adverts that show that it is only okay to have. 


 One realizes that the act of marketing to children is very irresponsible. It is unfair to place unnecessary pressure on parents and unethical to destroy the moral values that children need to have. These two and many more reasons suggest why everyone should come together and oppose marketing to children.


 References

Clay, R. A. (2000, September). Advertising to children: Is it ethical? Monitor on Psychology, p. 52.

Marketing to Children Overview. (n.d.). Retrieved from Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood: http://www.commercialfreechildhood.org/resource/marketing-children-overview

  


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Critical Examination of Zara's Nikah: The Unfair Portrayal of Kabir's Ambition and the Problematic Notions of Success in Modern Relationships

The recent episodes of Zara's Nikah have sparked considerable debate, particularly concerning the narrative arc where Zara employs emotional manipulation to pressure Kabir into pursuing conventional employment. While the show positions this as a feminist assertion of financial independence, a closer examination reveals troubling undertones—not only in how Kabir’s character is unfairly diminished but also in how the series perpetuates narrow definitions of success and ambition. At its core, this storyline raises essential questions about societal expectations, the true meaning of feminism, and whether love can survive when one partner imposes their ideals of achievement onto the other.   Kabir’s Existing Ambition: Overlooked and Undermined From the outset, the series establishes Kabir as a man deeply committed to his faith and community. He is an Islamic scholar, a respected leader, and someone who dedicates his time to meaningful projects—qualities that reflect a different bu...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Flawed Logic of China Fearmongering: A Rebuttal to Phillip Inman

 Phillip Inman's recent article, "World must be more wary than ever of China’s growing economic power,"  recycles tired Western anxieties about China's rise while ignoring the hypocrisy and self-interest driving these concerns. His arguments—framed as warnings—reveal not China's threats, but the West's inability to compete fairly in a changing global order.   Inman begins by praising Donald Trump's economic blockade against China, framing tariffs as legitimate tools of economic policy. This stance is baffling for anyone who believes in free markets. Tariffs artificially inflate prices, denying consumers access to the best goods at competitive rates. When governments impose such barriers, they don't protect their citizens—they impoverish them. The real victims are ordinary people forced to pay more for products that could have been affordable. Yet Inman celebrates these measures as if economic warfare benefits anyone but protectionist politicians.   His...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is There Hope for Kenya? Part 2: The Ruto Presidency and the Illusion of Change

 In Part 1, we examined how the election of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto in 2013 entrenched impunity and normalized corruption in Kenya. Now, we turn to Ruto’s presidency—a regime that promised transformation but has instead deepened the country’s crises through hypocrisy, repression, and the same old tribal politics. Ruto’s Questionable Past: From Mau Evictions to Poisonous Maize Long before becoming president, Ruto’s political career was marred by controversies. One of the most telling was his opposition to the evictions from the Mau Forest—a critical water tower that feeds multiple rivers across Kenya. As then-Prime Minister Raila Odinga led efforts to reclaim the forest from illegal settlers, Ruto and his allies, including Isaac Ruto, shamelessly opposed the move. Isaac Ruto’s infamous statement—"I have never seen rain fall from trees. We all know rains fall from the skies"—was not just ignorant but a deliberate exploitation of public gullibility. Yet, instead of being...
Post a Comment
Read more